A few days ago and a friend exchange, friends, that the current government has increased investment in the people's livelihood, such as retirees from enterprises to increase wages, increase family in rural and urban low subsidies, will greatly ease the gap between rich and poor in China because of the triggered a series of social problems, and even a breakthrough in solving social problems in China. For the views of friends, I agreed to increase investment in the people's livelihood will alleviate social problems exist, but which to conclude that the solution of social problems in China's medicine, the author is reservations.
old saying: Depository real conceivable manners. enough to eat does make people know how to get more respect and recognition, but not because of social problems can be solved enough to eat. When people solve the basic life problems, inevitably will have a high level levels of demand, such as participation in social activities, and the pursuit of a higher quality of life and so on. Mr. Ma Siluo demand theory has done a very good explanation, I do not have this details. When people eliminate the basic life stress, you will not be derived from more social problems, this is purely psychological needs of people is a one-sided or low-level cognition.
many in Chinese society problem, of course, the people's livelihood caused by inadequate investment, more is the system of inequalities. If you do not come from the system to achieve social justice, to proceed only from the increased investment in the people's livelihood, will be caught in a terrible vicious cycle to go, the one hand, increasing investment in the people's livelihood, on the other hand can not solve the power monopoly of corruption, income disparities under the industrial monopoly, the result is more investment in the people's livelihood, it will not fill people's basic psychology of a ;. The author is not opposed to increased investment in the people's livelihood, but to put people's livelihood in a rational and fair and open and transparent mechanism for effective investment, ensure that all inputs can truly benefit to people in need.
which I think has recently been on democracy and human rights of some controversy, some people openly clamoring that the Chinese do not need to set the West, the set is not suitable for Western China. I also think that a nation and a nation has its own inherent properties, does not have the West for China's social development needs, but some things in common, such as freedom, equality and fraternity, we have no reason to refuse? Since the set is not suitable for western China, why do we not allow our people to fully understand that the West now? social development and promote, not simply the negation of others can not, can not simply be blindly what others. Since the set of things that the West is not suitable for China to boldly tell the full truth of Western people the set What is the stuff, there is no need to pinch clutching his, so that everyone fully understand the actual situation of others, have the people to decide it, not by a person or an organization reject one-sided, as a result of damage themselves and others.
a country's development and the reconciliation of society, I believe that without a complete and advanced system of systems, relying only on a shattering way, eventually causing the east wall collapse , the estimate is difficult to make up the Western Wall. the power of corruption in Chinese society, rich and poor caused by imbalances and trade monopoly artificial widening income gap is impossible to increase the livelihood of the people from the investment will be able to cure, and at most to alleviate or delay the outbreak of the conflict, the final day of these problems is to focus on the outbreak, without a mechanism to alleviate these problems buffer, an organization of any one person broke out in the total of these contradictions are vulnerable and bear a strike.
China's problem is not lack of livelihood inputs, but the mechanism we have a problem. institutional problem is not speed up the reform and adjustment, to increase people's livelihood, but also a thing of the past into the final.
Tencent who struggle with the 360 Winner? price: Golden Week, why not see is prices to emphasize the is cold it?
No comments:
Post a Comment